Episode #1060 of Thinking With Mitch Joel is now live.
Everyone seems to have something to say these days… everyone has a platform, an opinion, a newsletter, a podcast or a LinkedIn strategy. And now, with AI, almost anyone can produce an endless stream of content that looks and sounds remarkably intelligent. But does that make someone a thought leader? And what happens when the people with the biggest audiences aren’t necessarily the people with the best ideas? That’s where my conversation with Peter Winick gets interesting. Peter is the founder and CEO of Thought Leadership Leverage, co-host of the Leveraging Thought Leadership podcast, and someone I’ve known and respected for years. His new book, The Thought Leadership Handbook – How The Experts Elevate Their Big Ideas And How You Can Too, co-authored with Bill Sherman and Naren Aryal, draws on hundreds of conversations and years of experience helping experts turn their knowledge into influence, impact and sustainable businesses. Peter and I explore the increasingly blurry lines between expertise, content creation, influencing and actual thought leadership. We get into why being recognized as an expert doesn’t automatically make someone a thought leader, and why calling yourself one might be the quickest way to undermine your credibility. We also tackle the economics of ideas. Peter introduces his framework of hobby, practice and business, which raises an important distinction between making a living from your expertise and building something that can create value beyond your individual time and presence. We discuss the challenge of finding the right customers, the difference between an audience and an economic buyer, and why even brilliant ideas struggle when there’s no meaningful market for them.
Of course, AI runs through much of this conversation.
Has it damaged the quality of business thinking, or simply exposed how formulaic so much of our content and nonfiction writing had already become? And if everyone can generate competent ideas and polished content, where does originality, expertise and genuine perspective begin to matter? Peter and I also wrestle with the changing value of books, why breakout success is rarely the meritocracy we imagine, the importance of consistency, and why every format, from writing to podcasting to speaking, demands its own craft. What stays with me is the distinction between becoming known and becoming worth knowing. In a world increasingly flooded with content, attention may be easier to manufacture, but developing ideas that genuinely change how people think remains something else entirely.
Listen to my conversation with Peter Winick here: Experts, Thought Leaders And Clowns With Peter Winick – TWMJ #1060.
Before you go… ThinkersOne is a new way for organizations to buy bite-sized and personalized thought leadership video content (live and recorded) from the best Thinkers in the world. If you’re looking to add excitement and big smarts to your meetings, corporate events, company off-sites, “lunch & learns” and beyond, check it out.
Welcome to episode #1060 of Thinking With Mitch Joel (formerly Six Pixels of Separation). What…
Is there one link, story or idea that stopped you this week… and made you…
I have “happy ears.” I tend to hear the positive (not the criticism). I lean…
“That looks like AI.” This is what I said after looking at a selfie I…
Episode #1059 of Thinking With Mitch Joel is now live. We spend so much time…
Welcome to episode #1059 of Thinking With Mitch Joel (formerly Six Pixels of Separation). What…
This website uses cookies.