I was boarding a plane earlier today and right before the door they have a batch of signs – you know the standard warning signs.
There was one in particular that I could not understand until I realized that someone had moved the sticky graphics around. The stick figure seated in the wheelchair now had an enormous protuberance – you can imagine the rest.
What amazed me was not the fact that someone played around with image, but rather that no one else seemed to notice or care. I smirked. It was funny… in a high school kind of way. It also made me realize that whoever did that broke the law, or did something wrong.
When someone takes a brand and does what they want to it online, we call it consumer generated content – whether the adaptation is good or bad.
Can someone be sued, fined or sent to jail for changing a sign in an airport? What are the consequences of doing the same thing to a company’s brand online?
People really hated Metallica for taking on Napster. How do we feel, as a society, about people adapting signs in airports? Especially considering the accolades we give to others for creating their own iPod commercial.
Episode #1056 of Thinking With Mitch Joel is now live. This conversation with Mike Michalowicz…
Welcome to episode #1056 of Thinking With Mitch Joel (formerly Six Pixels of Separation). Mike…
Is there one link, story or idea that stopped you this week… and made you…
For most of my professional life, I was taught how to write “properly”. I started…
Did we need to define music that was created with samplers and computers differently than…
I miss the internet. Not the slow modems… not the terrible websites... not the dancing…
This website uses cookies.