A Brand Of People

Posted by

It’s strange how much of a brand’s foundation is laid by the people who represent it.

It could be a pristine service with a genius business model that is created with the latest in cutting edge technology, but none of that matters if the people who represent it fail to live up to the basic promise of the brand. Case in point: Uber. Without a question, I think Uber has one of coolest and most interesting business models. I recently interviewed Tim Ferriss for my Six Pixels of Separation podcast (you can listen to it here: SPOS #333 – Learn To Do Anything With Tim Ferriss), and he described the service brilliantly: Uber allows any person to feel like a European diplomat. You initiate the app, hit the pick-up button and a driver in a black town car is there within a handful of minutes to deliver you to your destination of choice. Uber has a simple sign-up process that includes your credit card information. All you have to do is leave the car once you have arrived at your destination. Uber handles everything from the tip to the transaction to the very detailed billing. The app also enables you to see how many cars are in your area, approximate waiting time and once a driver has decided to engage you, their information (name, mobile number and license plate) is sent to you, plus you can track their position via GPS.

It works like a charm when it works like a charm.

You would think that this is an amazing story of entrepreneurship with a brilliant, beginning, middle and end. It’s not. On multiple occasions, I have had drivers text me to find out where I am going, and if the trip is too short or there is too much traffic, they make up some kind of excuse as to why the trip must be cancelled. It happened again today. It was rush hour and I needed to get from our Twist Image Toronto office to the downtown airport. It’s a ten minute ride. The Uber driver starts texting me requesting my destination and then tells me he’s coming, and then claims he had a flat. I found a cab in the rush hour traffic and barely made it to my flight on time. When I got to the airport, I checked my email and saw that the Uber driver charged me $15. When I texted the driver back that I will report him, he offered to pick me up. That was a pretty fast tire change. The system was working fine, until human beings started looking for an edge or angle that best serves them, but not the brand and the consumer.

This is not a customer service rant against Uber.

Uber is a great brand. The people who run it probably care deeply about a great consumer experience. By the time my flight landed, Lucas (one their community managers) wrote me a personal email of apology and refunded the money. The few drivers that have given me issues are not indicative of the Uber service, but they are a reflection on how I feel and interact with the brand. In short: it’s not an ideal service for me as I use it to get to airports and important meetings and that extra fifteen to twenty minutes of frustration that happen on occasion taint the experience for me. It’s nothing new. There’s the old saying that our IP leaves the building everyday at 5 pm. The people who greet us at the door, handle our projects and more are not just employees or team members, they are the brand. The living and breathing embodiment of it. All of the advertising, marketing, pomp and circumstance in the world, doesn’t add up to a hill of beans if you get a frown, an "I’m sorry. but that’s our policy," or other infuriating interactions.

Thinking about the brand of people.

People are not software. They’re not apps. They’re not programmed to respond in a fair, balanced and equal way. People are emotional creatures and this makes us all fall prey to things like  innuendo, bad moods, a feeling of resentment and more. If you look at the top business books on leadership and leading people, you’ll note one constant and common theme: motivation. People need to be reminded and motivated to turn that frown upside down, to serve the client, to deliver what was truly promised and to push back when being taken advantage of. We often let emotions get the better of us. Walking in the snow, dragging my carry-on in sub-zero weather while hoping to find a cab was not fun. The truth is that I don’t blame Uber for this. I blame one individual (this driver) who lacked the integrity to live up to the commitment he made to Uber when accepting to be a driver for them. Sadly, it limits my ability to use the service, because that service is based on speed and reliability. Uber’s job is not easy. Few brands have an easy job. Your brand probably deals with multiple similar scenarios every day. It’s a reality and a fact of life. The marketing lesson is about how brands handle it, train and motivate their people to stick to the plan and do the right thing. The external marketing lesson is a little trickier, because we all expect brands to live up to a baseline of serviceability. As we all work our way through the people that represent our brand, we want to celebrate their individuality and empower them to be true evangelists. Values and philosophy must always align. Sadly they don’t.

Another reminder that managing our brand is a big, important, time-consuming and all-consuming task.

7 comments

  1. Mitch
    This is a very thoughtful post (and a good rant).
    Even in a business partnership of two (like I have) the business is only as good as the worst partner on the worst day.
    I love your podcasts.
    Keith

  2. So unfortunate this happened, but as Tim mentions in his book “one has to know the best workers (in this case drivers) at the virtual agency & work only with them. If they’re “on assignment”, go down the list of other workers you’ve come to trust.
    The big picture is as you mention: It’s a real shame subcontractors think only of themselves in the context of the immediate situation, and ignore the fact that they ARE part of a team and a brand.

  3. There is an Uber competitor in Toronto and Chicago: Hailo. I’ve been testing both services since the beginning of the year and will likely write a blog post about my experiences. With Hailo, I’ve had zero problems. I even got a cab when I jumped off the El and need to shoot across town the other day. But I’ve had similar issues like you cite with Uber.
    Of course, that’s not the point of your blog post. I say that only because, if you want to check out a different app for the urgent meetings and airport jaunts, there is another option.

  4. Great post! I have always had good luck with Uber, but you’re right that it doesn’t take much to ruin or tarnish a brand’s image. We help people figure out how to keep their brand in tact while managing a trade show display (Booth staffers have the power to make a great first impression … or a really bad one! http://bit.ly/TwRdU3)

  5. Thanks for the article, Mitch.
    You finished with the statement “Another reminder that managing our brand is a big, important, time-consuming and all-consuming task.”
    Sadly, nearly everything is a big, important, time-consuming and all-consuming task. Just when you think you’ve found a shortcut for what used to be a cumbersome weight, you find that the shortcut doesn’t work. The truth is, there are almost no shortcuts. For anything.
    To your point, when brands find a way to break through the apathy and become people-whisperers to their staff, you truly do notice.
    Thanks for the reminder.

  6. I love a good rant like this that teaches a lesson. The app is using technology to create an experience, and yet isn’t wisely using the crowd to monitor and weed out the bad behavior. If these drivers were rated, I am guessing it would clear up immediately. How to encourage end user feedback into a management decision-making system is a constant effort.

  7. Brilliant post, Mitch. Rant on brother. If a company can’t survive said rant they need to re-evaluate their offering. Any employee could be the only employee a customer ever meets so every touch point needs superior customer service which begins with internal customer service and leadership.
    I admired Zappos for publicly announcing in 2011 they were no longer able to keep their brand promise with Canadian customers because their supply chain was letting them down. Instead of leaving customers with their version of a bad driver experience, their COO/CFO Chris Neilson stood in front of customers and told them straight then shared his email address and phone number. Canada is the 11th largest GDP in the world, the decision could not have been an easy one.
    While we take good care of our brands, let’s taking good care of our people so they can take good care of our customers.

Comments are closed.